• Obama disparages troops by claiming, “Air-Raiding Villages and Killing Civilians’ in Afghanistan” – Watch the video here.
• Obama using law enforcment to shutdown opponents’ free speech – Imagine the outcry if McCain or a Republican tried that.
• Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement
• Obama and Ayers Pushed Radicalism On Schools
• A Mighty Oak From a Little Acorn
• Obama’s Liberal Shock Troops
• Democratic Ally Mobilizes In Housing Crunch
• Brunner’s Lackey TRIES to Defend No Observers: Epic Failure – Ohio voter fraud update
• More on how the Democrats were a large cause fo the current Financial Crisis

<blockquote>
When the <b>young leader spoke eloquently and passionately and denounced the old system, the press fell in love with him</b>. They <b>never questioned</b> who <b>his friends</b> were or <b>what he really believed</b> in. When he said he would help the farmers and the poor and bring free medical care and education to all, everyone followed. When he said he would bring justice and equality to all, everyone said “Praise the Lord.” And when the young leader said, “<b>I will be for change and I’ll bring you change,” everyone yelled, “Viva Fidel!”</b>

But nobody asked about the change, so <b>by the time the executioner’s guns went silent the people’s guns had been taken away. By the time everyone was equal, they were equally poor, hungry, and oppressed. By the time everyone received their free education it was worth nothing. By the time the press noticed, it was too late, because they were now working for him</b>. By the time the change was finally implemented Cuba had been knocked down a couple of notches to Third-World status. By the time the change was over more than a million people had taken to boats, rafts, and inner tubes. You can call those who made it ashore anywhere else in the world the most fortunate Cubans. And now I’m back to the beginning of my story.

Luckily, we would never fall in America for a young leader who promised change without asking, what change? How will you carry it out? What will it cost America?

Would we?

Manuel Alvarez Jr. Sandy Hook.
</blockquote>

Technorati Tags: <a class=”performancingtags” href=”http://technorati.com/tag/Obama” rel=”tag”>Obama</a>, <a class=”performancingtags” href=”http://technorati.com/tag/Barack” rel=”tag”>Barack</a>, <a class=”performancingtags” href=”http://technorati.com/tag/Fidel” rel=”tag”>Fidel</a>, <a class=”performancingtags” href=”http://technorati.com/tag/Cuba” rel=”tag”>Cuba</a>, <a class=”performancingtags” href=”http://technorati.com/tag/nannyocracy” rel=”tag”>nannyocracy</a>, <a class=”performancingtags” href=”http://technorati.com/tag/nanny state” rel=”tag”>nanny state</a>, <a class=”performancingtags” href=”http://technorati.com/tag/” rel=”tag”></a>

He has ties to the PLO:

And now we learn he is getting campaign contributions from terrorist hotbed.

According to Federal Election Commission filings, Barack Obama has received illegal donations from Palestinians living in Gaza, a hotbed of Hamas terrorists. Obama received more than $24,000 in campaign contributions over a period of two months last fall from three Palestinian brothers from the “Edwan” family in Rafah, Gaza, which is a Hamas stronghold along the border with Egypt. The story was uncovered by Pamela Geller of the Atlas Shrugs blog. (see Federal Election Commission report)
——————————–
“The donations are basically through and through illegal — that’s number one. And number two is how the Obama campaign tried to conceal it,” Schlussel Terrorist with hostagechides. “They listed the campaign contributions as coming from Rafah, Georgia. They used the ‘GA’ from Gaza so it makes it look like it’s legal; and then for the zip code it says ‘972,’ which is actually the area code to dial over to Gaza,” she contends.

In the annals of judicial imperialism, we have arrived at a strange new chapter. A California court ruled this month that parents cannot “home school” their children without government certification. No teaching credential, no teaching. Parents “do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,” wrote California appellate Justice Walter Croskey.
—————————————–
That so many families turn to home schooling is a market solution to a market failure — namely the dismal performance of the local education monopoly. According to the Home School Legal Defense Association, the majority of states have low to moderate levels of regulation for home schools, an environment that has allowed the option to flourish, especially in the South and Western U.S. Between 1999 and 2003, the rate of home-schooling increased by 29%.
—————————————–
If John McCain wants an issue to endear him to cultural conservatives, this would be it. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama rarely stray from the preferences of the teachers unions, but we’d like to know whether they really favor the certification of parents who dare to believe they know best how to teach their children.

This is the whole crux of the home school debate, are parents qualified to educate their own children or should parents be certified by the State? The answer should be NO to anyone who loves freedom. If you are hesitating to answer No, think for a minute what that means. You are saying the the government has the right to tell you how to raise your child. What’s next, parental discipline certification? parental birth certification? The unintended consequences of this step into parental rights will very likely lead to the complete take over of child rearing authority by the government.

As the quote reminds us, be careful who you choose to elect as our next President. We must elect the candidate who believes in the freedom of the individual instead of the power of the State. It would nice to have each of the candidates weigh in on this question with a straightforward Yes or No answer as to whether they support certifying parents or not.